• Home
  • Blog
  • Online Tutoring
  • Reaction Guide
  • Study Guides
  • About
  • Members Login

Master Organic Chemistry

  • New? Start Here
  • Study And Exam Tips
  • Organic 1 Index
  • Organic 2 Index
  • Free “Cheat Sheets”
  • Feedback

On Cats, Part 3: Newman Projections

November 22, 2010 By James Ashenhurst 18 Comments

Do you know where the saying “there’s more than one way to skin a cat” comes from? Me neither. But I do know one thing: there is more than one way to draw cat conformations.

Last time I introduced the Cat Line Diagram and showed how we can use it to depict these 3-dimensional creatures on a 2-dimensional page. Another name for the Cat Line diagram is the “Line-Wedge” diagram since we use wedges to depict the parts that come out of the page, normal lines to depict the parts that are in the plane of the page, and dashes to show the parts that are pointing into the page.

Now it might strike you as rather arbitrary that I chose to do the drawing from the side. You are right. In fact, depending on your point of view, you can depict a 3-dimensional cat in several different ways.

Here is a picture of three different cats that are all in the same conformation. The only thing that is different between these conformations is the angle we’ve chosen to depict it.

1-samedifferent copy

If we depict it from above and a little to the side, we have what we can refer to as a Sawhorse projection. I call it the Sawhorse because, well, it resembles one. Note how the lines and the substituents (H=head, T=tail, F=foot) clearly show the orientation.

Now, an alternative way to depict conformations is the front-on view. Here, you’ll note that the spine (the “central axis”) is hidden, as we are viewing the conformation from the front. (Note: this is arbitrary – I could also have depicted the same picture from the back, but  I’m not going to put up pictures of cat butts. That would be sick). Besides giving me an excuse to put even cuter pictures of cats on my blog, this depiction has some advantages, as we shall soon see. I call this the Newman projection since the cat in particular belongs to my neighbor Schlomo Newman, and he only allowed me to take pictures of it on the condition that I give him the intellectual property rights. I also had to buy him a kilo of very expensive hummus, but that’s another story.

The Newman projection is a particularly clever way to depict cat conformations, if I don’t say so myself. One of the main advantages is that it makes it very clear what the relative orientations of the feet, head, and tail in a given conformation are.

Here’s another example:

2-Untitled-1 copy

Let’s look at the two conformations side by side:

3-Untitled-24 copy

Note here the difference in the Newman projection of these two cats. The projection isn’t quite the same (one is from the front, and one is from the back) but they show a rotation about the central axis of 60 degrees. In the orientation on the left, each of the front feet are co-planar with the back feet, and the head is in the same plane as the tail. Since the parts on the front (the head and two feet) block out our view of the parts on the back (the tail and two feet) we can call this the eclipsed conformation.

Now look at the conformation on the right. Here (although the picture is not the best, I admit) the parts in the front do not obscure our view of the parts in the back. Since everything is offset at a 60 degree angle, why not call this the staggered conformation.

One of the cool things about the Newman is that it makes drawing rotations a snap. It gives us another theoretical cat model that we can manipulate on a page without having to do it on the real thing. Schlomo insisted that I not attempt any “funny stuff” with his cat which I took to mean not rotating it around any weird angles. So we’ll just have to do it on paper without the aid of a cat photo.

You can convert the eclipsed conformation to the staggered simply by keeping one half the same (the front part, in our example) and rotating the back half 60 degrees. This gives us the staggered conformation.

In my opinion this makes rotations a bit easier to visualize than with the cat line diagram. But it’s still a valuable skill to learn how to convert the two.

4-Untitled-21 copy

Now let’s get even more nerdy. If we take out a protractor we can actually measure some of the angles involved and start to gain a more qualitative understanding of the difference between these two orientations.

Let’s define an angle, the dihedral angle, as being the angle made by a substituent (i.e. head (H), tail (T), foot(F)) on the front half and one on the back half, as we gaze along the central axis (spine). We pick one substituent as a reference and then measure the angles from there. Let’s pick the head (H) as our reference here.

5-synantigauche copy

For instance in the eclipsed conformation above, the tail (T) and head (H) are in the same plane. They line up just like the minute and hour hands do at midnight: the dihedral angle here is 0°.  Since they’re on the Same Side, let’s call that Syn. The next dihedral angles to examine in the eclipsed conformation are the ones between the head and the two feet: they are +120° and -120° respectively.

Now let’s look at the staggered conformation. Here, the angle between the head and tail is 60 degrees clockwise (+60°). Since this is a little off-kilter, kind of like wearing a chartreuse blouse with a pink skirt, let’s give it a weird, tacky and nonsensical name – like “gauche”. The orientation between the head and foot here is –60° (or +240° if you like). This is also “gauche”. Finally, let’s look at the head (H) and the other foot (F) here; they have a dihedral angle of 180°. Since they’re on opposite sides, I might want to call them just “opposite” but let’s continue with some esoteric terminology and call this conformation “anti”.

So with this terminology we can start to give names to many of the weird conformations you’ll see cats adopt. We can use either wedge-line, sawhorse, or Newman projections to show cat conformations and each of these names applies, no matter how we draw them. Like this.

6-Untitled-15 copy

Final test for your cat terminology: application. Try this the next time you are at home.

Roommate: Dude what is up with your cat?

You: Ginger is clearly hungry. She’s in the eclipsed conformation and her head and tail are syn-periplanar.

Roommate: WTF

Next post: On Cats, Part 4: Enantiocats

Related Posts:

  • Assigning R/S To Newman Projections (And Converting Newman To Line Diagrams)
  • On Cats, Part 8: Moe the Meso Cat
  • On Cats, Part 7: The Fischer Projection
  • On Cats, Part 6: Stereocenters

Filed Under: Conformations, Organic Chemistry 1, Stereochemistry Tagged With: cats, conformations, eclipsed, newman proejctions, rotation, staggered, stereocenters

Comments

  1. Jake says

    November 25, 2010 at 2:38 am

    Can’t figure which I like more: the sawhorse or the Newman Projections.

    I especially like the staggered conformer of kitty cleaning herself or himself. Lol!

    Please keep posting!

    Reply
    • James says

      November 25, 2010 at 3:35 pm

      thanks! I like the Newman but it’s hard to convince cats to twist themselves the right way

      Reply
      • Annie says

        February 12, 2013 at 10:17 pm

        U should seriously use my cats pictures. Hes a gymnast! He sits on his butt which would be perfect for the newman projection.

        BTW, i still dont get newman projection, i dont know what im missing.

        Reply
        • james says

          February 13, 2013 at 3:05 pm

          Send them! I’d use them!

          Reply
  2. cam says

    January 22, 2011 at 9:35 am

    really sweet! make me more intrested n more fun learning~
    congrate =D

    Reply
  3. azmanam says

    October 14, 2011 at 5:11 pm

    It should be called the CAThedral angle! AAAAAAHAHAHA

    Reply
    • james says

      October 16, 2011 at 1:29 pm

      Why didn’t I think of that

      Reply
  4. Kate says

    May 1, 2012 at 12:10 am

    Brilliant! I don’t hate stereochemistry anymore/ gotta check out what you have on chirality, i cringe every time i have to do S-L determination.

    Reply
    • james says

      May 1, 2012 at 5:49 pm

      This series of videos is very helpful for R/S : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raJ4UMQaX8U&feature=relmfu

      Reply
  5. Tess says

    December 7, 2012 at 8:49 pm

    Will you marry me?

    Reply
  6. Lucia says

    December 10, 2012 at 7:30 am

    Brilliant!!!!!! I`m a biochemist in Uruguay, though i`m more fond of cats lately…. loved this site!

    Reply
  7. Victor says

    December 11, 2012 at 6:38 am

    it looks like the photos were made in jerusalem?
    greetings from huji chemistry student :)

    Reply
  8. Sajeda says

    June 12, 2013 at 10:03 am

    haha…cat butts. ^_^

    Reply
  9. ramkumar says

    August 21, 2013 at 10:35 pm

    Brilliant!!!!! nice explanations and understandable. thank you sir

    Reply
  10. Kay says

    September 4, 2013 at 12:31 am

    This makes way more sense than either my textbook or professor, haha. So it doesn’t matter how many carbons are in a chain, they ultimately look the same, right? If I were comparing ethane to propane, for example, I wouldn’t have to add in additional hydrogens or anything?

    Reply
    • James Ashenhurst says

      September 4, 2013 at 2:21 pm

      If you were going from a Newman of ethane to doing a Newman of propane, you’d replace one of the H atoms of ethane with a CH3. Does that help?

      Reply

Leave a Reply to Victor Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Copyright © 2019 · MasterOrganicChemistry.com · All Rights Reserved
Organic Chemistry Is Awesome