Bromination of Alkenes
Last updated: July 5th, 2019 |
Bromination of Alkenes Gives anti Products
In a previous post we went through the key reactions of the carbocation pathway. It’s a family of reactions which proceed through 1) attack of an alkene upon an acid, forming a free carbocation, and 2) attack of a nucleophile upon the carbocation.
Although we saw that several key reactions of alkenes were consistent with this mechanism, it isn’t the case for all. Take the bromination of alkenes, for instance.
Treatment of an alkene with bromine (Br2) in a chlorinated solvent (CHCl3, and CH2Cl2 are popular choices; CCl4 is often cited in textbooks*) leads to the formation of products containing two bromine atoms.
In this post we’ll describe the main observations that have been made about this reaction, and in the following post we’ll show the best theory we have for the mechanism.
Table of Contents
- Bromination Of Alkenes Observation #1: Only anti Products Are Observed
- Bromination of Alkenes Observation #2: The Reaction Is Stereospecific
- Observation #3: Rearrangements Are Never Observed
- Observation #4: Certain Solvents Can Affect The Reaction Products
- Summary: Bromination Of Alkenes
Possibly the most interesting feature of this reaction is that the products follow a very predictable stereochemical pattern. For instance, in the reaction of cyclohexene with Br2, the two bromine atoms add to opposite faces of the alkene (“anti” stereochemistry). No “syn” products are observed. [note]
What’s even more interesting is that the stereochemistry of the starting alkene is directly related to the stereochemistry of the product.
For instance if we treat cis-2-butene [aka (Z)-2-butene] with Br2, we get a mixture of enantiomers.
But if we treat trans-2-butene, we only get a single product (“meso” 2,3-dibromobutane), which is itself a diastereomer of (S,S)-2,3-dibromobutane and (R,R)-2,3-dibromobutane.
These starting materials, cis-But-2-ene and trans-But-2-ene, which differ only in the configuration of the double bond, lead to stereoisomeric products. This type of process is given the name, stereospecific.
What’s important about this? Two things.
First, given the product, it’s possible to work backwards to figure out which isomer of cis-But-2-ene was the starting material. (Expect to be tested on this).
Secondly, the fact that this happens means that the mechanism is inconsistent with a free carbocation! If there was a free carbocation, the stereochemistry of the starting alkene wouldn’t matter, since attack can come from either face. [Indeed, we know from labelling experiments that the reaction of H-Cl with cis or trans 2-butene is not stereospecific].
Another reason this reaction is consistent with the absence of a free carbocation is because rearrangements are never observed. For example, in the case below, we’d expect to see rearrangement (a 1,2-alkyl shift, to be precise) if a free carbocation was formed.
Instead, note that the methyl groups stay in the same place.
Here’s another experimental observation. The solvent matters.
When we use water as the solvent for this reaction, we get the product below.
[Note – this is called a “bromohydrin” since we have incorporated both bromine and water] .
Note that the stereochemistry is still “anti”, as before.
What this means is that somehow our solvent has intercepted a reactive intermediate in this reaction to produce the product above. (Note – this also occurs when we use alcohols as solvents; in these cases, ethers are obtained).
What’s even more interesting is that the reaction is regioselective. That is, when we have an unsymmetrical alkene, the major product is the one where water has added to the most substituted carbon of the alkene [most substituted = the sp2 carbon of the alkene directly attached to the fewest hydrogen atoms]. Such so-called “Markovnikov” selectivity was also observed in the reactions that proceed along the “carbocation pathway”.
So what’s going on? How can we explain these observations?
- Anti stereochemistry observed
- No carbocation intermediate (stereospecific, no rearrangements)
- Can be intercepted by nucleophilic solvent; attack occurs at most substituted carbon of the original alkene
What’s the mechanism for this process?
In the next post we’ll go through the best hypothesis we have for the mechanism of this reaction.
NEXT POST: Bromination of Alkenes – The Mechanism
* Off topic note: For some reason, textbooks continue to cite CCl4 as a common solvent for these reactions. Back in the day, CCl4 was a commodity chemical used for drycleaning (among other uses) and was a cheap, commonly available solvent. Since the discovery of its role in depletion of the ozone layer, the Montreal convention on CFCs has heavily restricted the availability of CCl4 to the point where legally obtaining CCl4 has become extremely difficult for labs in some countries. (Although it can often be substituted for other solvents, there are cases where nothing else will do. During my PhD in Canada several of us hoarded old, near-empty bottles of CCl4 the same way one might guard a precious bottle of 18-year old Scotch. )
There are exceptions to the rule that only anti products are observed. If bromination occurrs on an alkene adjacent to an aromatic ring, some products that appear to have been produced from syn bromination are observed. This is particularly true in any case where a long-lived, stable carbocation can be formed (such as a benzylic carbocation).