Reactions of Sugars: Glycosylation and Protection
Last updated: January 8th, 2020 |
Finally, Some Reactions Of Sugars: Glycosylation And Protection
In this post we introduce some simple reactions of sugars, especially glycosylation and protection:
- Formation of “glycosides” – just a different name for acetals when they exist at the “anomeric” carbon of sugars
- Hydrolysis of glycosidic bonds (glycosides), which is exactly like hydrolysis of acetals (aqueous acid)
- Reactions on the -OH groups of sugars, including protecting groups
- How to “deprotect” the anomeric (C-1) carbon selectively
Table of Contents
- Carbohydrates and Sugars: Finally, Some Reactions!
- Reactions At The Hemiacetal (Anomeric) Carbon: Formation And Hydrolysis Of “Glycosides”
- Hydrolysis of Glycosides with Aqueous Acid
- Formation of Disaccharides (In Theory, If Not In Practice)
- Hydrolysis of The Glycosidic Bond Of Disaccharides
- Reactions Of The Alcohol Groups Of Sugars: The Problem Of Selectivity
- A Brute Force Way Around Selectivity: Excess Reagent
- Ethers At C-1 (The Anomeric Carbon) Can Be Cleaved Selectively
- How To Get Around The Selectivity Problem? A Glimpse Into Org 3
If reactions are the meat of an organic chemistry course, then nomenclature is the bun – and you’d be forgiven for thinking that the content in this chapter on sugars has been a little, er, “carb-heavy” so far.
A lot of nomenclature and not many reactions!
We’re going to try to fix this deficiency in our chemistry diet today with a discussion of the key reactions of sugars.
The reactions of sugars we will cover really boil down to two main categories.
Part 1: Reactions of the anomeric (hemiacetal) carbon
The anomeric carbon of a sugar can form and break acetals. That’s about it.
- Formation of acetals (“glycosides”), including disaccharides and polysaccharides
- Hydrolysis (cleavage) of acetals (“glycosides”)
Part 2: Reactions of carbohydrate hydroxy groups (alcohols)
The hydroxy groups of sugars can perform all the reactions of alcohols (e.g. ether formation). The trick is getting the right one to react! d
- Ether formation (non-selective, except in special cases with the primary (C6) alcohol)
- Ester (acetate) formation (non-selective) with Ac2O.
We’ll finish up with a few remarks about how reactions of carbohydrates really take us to the limits of what we study in “Org 2” and how it points the way to “Org 3”.
A few chapters ago, we saw how to convert aldehydes and ketones to acetals, via hemiacetals. In the forward direction, this is accomplished by treating the ketone (or aldehyde) with an excess of alcohol in the presence of acid (such as H2SO4).
Simple sugars (e.g., D-Glucose) have a hemiacetal functional group due to the fact that 5- and 6- membered rings readily form between the carbonyl carbon and the hydroxyl groups, a phenomenon known as “ring-chain tautomerism“.
So, the hemiacetal functional group on sugars can also be converted into a full acetal by treatment with an alcohol in the presence of acid.
In carbohydrate chemistry, these acetals have a special name: “glycosides“.
Here’s an example. Treating D-glucose with ethanol and acid provides a product called Ethyl -D-glucopyranoside.
The new C–O bond is called a “glycosidic bond”. In the drawing above, we drew only one anomer (the α), but in practice both will form.
Formation of the glycoside “locks” the ring closed, and it is no longer in equilibrium with the open-chain form, and is therefore no longer a “reducing sugar” [see: Reducing Sugars]. Like all acetals, about the only reaction of significance that it will undergo is hydrolysis back to the starting material with aqueous acid.
So treatment of a glycoside with water and acid results in the original sugar (as a mixture of anomers, which we can describe with a “squiggly line”).
A particularly important type of glycoside are those formed from the combination of two or more sugars. Maltose, for example, is the acetal formed when C-1 of D-glucose reacts with the C4-OH of another molecule of D-glucose to form an α- glycosidic linkage.
A quick way of describing this linkage is (α-1→4), where 1 and 4 indicate the numbers of the carbons flanking the glycosidic bond, and “α” indicates the stereochemistry at the anomeric carbon. [quick review of alpha and beta]
In theory, it’s possible to carry out this reaction by treating D-glucose with acid:
[To see the mechanism click here for a pop-up image. ]
In practice? Well, the drawing above is a bit misleading.
In the lab, adding acid to glucose might get you some maltose, but it will also deliver a ton of other side-products from the reaction of other hydroxy groups (C1-OH, C2-OH, etc.) with the C-1 carbon. (it’s the kind of reaction my friend Jeff would write in his lab notebook as “BFM”, where “M” stands for “mess”).
In nature, very specific enzymes have evolved that combine sugars together with exquisite site-selectivity (“regioselectivity” for C4-OH in this case, versus the other possible alcohols as nucleophiles) and stereoselectivity (α- for maltose).
[For example, it’s very important that the orientation at the C-1 acetal is drawn alpha (α) for maltose. The beta (β) stereoisomer is another disaccharide entirely (cellobiose).]
- sucrose (table sugar) is a disaccharide formed through acetal formation between C-1 of glucose and C-2 of fructose (α-1→β-2 linkage)
- lactose is a disaccharide formed between C-1 of galactose and C4-OH of glucose (β-1→4 linkage).
- Amylose, one of the two components of starch, is a polysaccharide of glucose linked through (α-1→4) glycosidic bonds.
All are built through formation of glycosidic bonds between sugars – in other words, good-old acetal formation.
Just as with ethyl D-glucopyranoside, above, adding aqueous acid to a polysaccharide will hydrolyze it back into the constitutent sugars.
D-lactose, for instance, can be hydrolyzed back into D-Galactose and D-Glucose with aqueous acid:
In organisms, enzymes perform the hydrolysis of glycosides – these are called glycosidases . The familiar condition of “lactose intolerance” is a result of the body lacking the necessary enzyme (lactase) to break down the glycosidic bond of lactose.
Enzymes can be exquisitely sensitive to stereochemistry. Starch, a polymer of glucose with (α-1→4) glycosidic bonds, is easily broken down in our bodies to units of D-Glucose, but cellulose [with (β-1→4) glucose linkages] is not. [Fun fact: Grass-eating mammals like cows rely on microorganisms in their gut to convert cellulose to glucose].
What kind of reactions do the hydroxy groups of sugars undergo? They’re essentially just alcohols, right?
You may recall that to perform a Williamson, all we need to do is add base and an alkyl halide, and voila – an ether forms.
What could possibly go wrong?
Well, at least four things could go wrong, actually. The C-3 OH isn’t significantly more selective toward CH3I than any of the other four hydroxyl groups.
The result is a mixture of products which requires a tedious separation.
Even with all the advances of modern organic chemistry, there’s no known way to get the Williamson ether synthesis to occur selectively with, say, the C3-OH of glucose in good yields without also forming ethers at the other hydroxyl groups.
This might seem hard to believe but it is true. The more we learn about organic chemistry, the more we learn to appreciate just how incredible Nature is in devising extremely selective catalysts for reactions on sugars at specific sites without the use of protecting groups.
There’s still lots to discover in organic chemistry!
[There is one reliable way to put a single ether group on a sugar like glucose. The C6-OH is a primary alcohol, and therefore less sterically hindered than the other alcohol groups. It is possible to use a very bulky alkyl halide like trityl chloride and have it react selectively there. See this note below ]
No matter what reaction you try – oxidation, acetylation, halogenation, or silylation – you’ll almost always run into this problem with unprotected sugars. A workaround is in order. [Note 2]
If we abandon all hopes of selectivity, good yields can be obtained by just treating the sugar with a vast excess of a given reagent. For example if we treat glucose with excess methyl iodide in the presence of base, we get the penta-ether in high yield. [We sometimes call this, “exhaustive methylation”]. [Note]
Using an excess of acetic anhydride, one can also form the “penta-acetate”:
Some very familiar plastics from modern life are the result of treating the polysaccharide cellulose with various reagents under “exhaustive” conditions:
- Cellulose acetate film (“safety film”, from treating cellulose with excess acetic anhydride)
- Celluloid (the first plastic, originally used as film stock, obtained through nitration of cellulose)
- Rayon (where cellulose is treated with excess carbon disulfide to form xanthates)
One note. It’s possible to free up the C-1 hydroxyl group on the penta-ether through acidic hydrolysis, because the anomeric carbon (C-1) is part of an acetal.
This might look like an ether cleavage (which usually requires a very harsh acid like H-I) but is actually just hydrolysis of an acetal. (A good “trick” exam question!).
Until we develop catalysts that rival enzymes in their ability to react selectively with the hydroxyl groups of sugars, we’re left with protecting group strategies.
We briefly covered protecting groups in the chapter on alcohols. [see: “Protecting Groups For Alcohols“] With sugars, protecting group strategies are taken to a whole new level. It’s a big topic – one we don’t have time for in this post today. [Here is a start, though.]
A Glimpse Into The Land Beyond
I’d argue that protecting group strategies of sugars is really a topic for what you might call “Org 3”.
What does that mean?
Org 1 and Org 2 are courses that introduce the properties of the various functional groups and their major reactions. The functional groups are largely treated in isolation.
It’s a bit like chess. Org 1 and Org 2 is like learning the rules of how the game is played, and how the pieces (functional groups) move.
In Org 3, life gets more complicated. We learn how to devise strategies to deal with the many real-life situations where a molecule has multiple reactive functional groups (like glucose!) , and we need to selectively form a bond at just one of them.
Or, in chess terms, it’s where you start to learn how to coordinate all your pieces together in an overall strategy.
In the meantime, I hope this post has been more beef and less bun.
The trityl group (triphenylmethyl) is so frickin’ massive that it tends only to fit on primary alcohols, so it will react selectively with the C-6 hydroxyl group:
I can say from experience that it also feels really good after you put it on, since the mass of your product skyrockets (“started with 400 mgs, and now I almost have a gram. YESSS!”). This feeling disappears, however, when it’s removed with trichloroacetic acid. Another option is the bulky silyl group t-butyldiphenylsilyl chloride (TBDPS).
Note 2. This is way above Org 2, but here’s a very useful protection sequence that allows for selective functionalization of C-3 of D-glucose. Treatment with acetone and acid (one can also use a Lewis acid, like CuSO4) ties up 4 of the 5 hydroxyl groups as “acetonides” (acetals of acetone). This leaves the C-3 OH, which can then be selectively methylated, if desired. [This was used in the Nicolaou synthesis of Leucomycin A to put a methyl ether on C-3 of glucose. See “Adventures In Carbohydrate Chemistry” for many more wonderful examples. ]
Note 3. A more reversible variant of this reaction forms benzyl ethers instead of methyl ethers (which can be notoriously difficult to cleave). The benzyl ethers can be removed by treatment with Pd/C and hydrogen gas.