Fun and Miscellaneous
What Holds The Nucleus Together?
Last updated: March 29th, 2019 |
Here’s what I would call the One Sentence Summary Of Chemistry. If you learn just one thing about chemistry, learn this.
“Opposite charges attract, like charges repel”.
We’ll go into a lot more detail over the next few posts, but let’s get started by thinking of some examples.
- positive charges attract negative charges – Two examples here. Think of the negatively charged electron that orbits the positively charged nucleus. Or sodium chloride, which is composed of positively charged sodium ions held together with negatively charged chlorine ions. Positive attracts negative. Check.
- Negative charges repel negative charges. You may recall that the shape of a molecule depends on the number of bonds/electron pairs around an atom. Why is water bent, for instance? That’s because the oxygen lone pairs each take up space, and the electron pairs repel until they are the maximum distance apart. That’s also why a molecule like methane is tetrahedral and not square planar.
- Positive charges repel positive charges. It’s harder to think of examples here, but here’s one. It’s relatively easy to add a proton to water to give [H3O]+, but very difficult to protonate that further to give [H4O]2+ due to repulsion.
It’s this last one which seems weird. If it’s so hard to make [H4O]2+, for instance, how is it that the nucleus holds together, since it’s essentially made of positively charged protons with a few neutrons thrown in.? It’s especially weird when you consider that these positive charges are distributed over such a short distance.
Let’s take a step back to look at the Really Big Picture to find out.
The Really Big Picture
Physicists have identified four fundamental forces in nature that are responsible for all the phenomena we observe. They are
- gravity, which acts at long range, and is attractive (but weak)
- electromagnetism – responsible for the behavior of electric and magnetic fields.
- the weak nuclear force, responsible for certain types of nuclear decay (when a neutron breaks down into a proton and an electron, that’s the weak nuclear force at work).
- and then we come to the strong nuclear force, which acts at very short range and is attractive.
The forces vary in strength over many, many orders of magnitude (getting the extremely weak gravitational force to fit into a Theory of Everthing, in particular, has been driving physicists nuts for decades).
Chemistry is predominantly about electromagnetism . The study of chemistry is largely the study of electrons and how they flow between atoms. In chemistry, we’re essentially just looking at electrons and nuclei as point charges, and treating the chemical bonds that form between them as electrostatic phenomena. Furthermore, the electromagnetic fields accompanied by these charges can interact with radiation with wavelengths all across the electromagnetic spectrum, giving rise to the huge variety of spectroscopic techniques we have developed to help give us clues as to the structure of atoms and molecules.
What about the other forces in chemistry? Gravity is irrelevant – compared to the electromagnetic force, it’s a rounding error at the 30th decimal place, essentially. The weak nuclear force doesn’t much come into play either, especially when it comes to the meat and potatoes organic chemistry we’re going to be discussing. What about the strong nuclear force? It has one – and only one – important role in the chemistry we’re going to discuss, and that’s it.
What holds the nucleus together? The strong nuclear force. At extremely short range, it is stronger than electrostatic repulsion, and allows protons to stick together in a nucleus even though their charges repel each other. Remember that the size of the nucleus is really small compared to the size of an atom. Since it operates only over distances comparable with the diameter of an atom, it isn’t felt at longer distances, and for the purposes of chemistry, we ignore it.
When it comes to the strong force, there is a break-even point. Physicists have observed that the nucleus becomes increasingly more stable upon the addition of nucleons up to iron-56. Then, as successive protons are added, the nucleus gets more and more unstable, due to the electrostatic repulsion outweighing the attractive nuclear force. Once you get up to really high atomic numbers, the nucleus becomes unstable and can fragment into smaller, more stable components. This is the basis of nuclear fission, or why uranium (atomic number 92) and plutonium (atomic number 94) are used for atomic energy (and nuclear weapons). So over a large enough distance, there’s an limit to how much positive charge you can put in the nucleus without making it highly unstable. This is why I wouldn’t be expecting to read much about the chemistry of the g-block elements anytime soon.